|
|
|
@ -69,14 +69,12 @@
|
|
|
|
\frametitle{Data set}
|
|
|
|
\frametitle{Data set}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\item Training Data: 8.2K+ data points
|
|
|
|
\item Training Data: 8.2K+ data points
|
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
\item background - 4.8K
|
|
|
|
\item background - 4.8K
|
|
|
|
\item method - 2.3K
|
|
|
|
\item method - 2.3K
|
|
|
|
\item result - 1.1K
|
|
|
|
\item result - 1.1K
|
|
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
\bigskip
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\item Testing Data: 1.8K data points
|
|
|
|
\item Testing Data: 1.8K data points
|
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
\item background - 1K
|
|
|
|
\item background - 1K
|
|
|
|
@ -85,6 +83,22 @@
|
|
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{table}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{tabular}{| l | c | c} \hline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 lead to a decrease in SC absorption in mice & \\
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Deng et al., 2010; Deng et al., 2012). & background \\
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\hline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We used an active contour algorithm [10] to segment & \\
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
organs from 340 coronal slices over the two patients. & method \\
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\hline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar results were found by Sideris et al. (1999) in & \\
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greece and Mohebali et al. (2005) in Iran. & result \\
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\hline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\caption{Sample Dataset}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|